|

| |
|
|
|
Bell Canada and Microsoft Corp. launched a combined Sympatico.ca and
MSN.ca website Wednesday, describing it as Canada's most “comprehensive
Internet destination.”
In a statement, the companies said Sympatico.MSN.ca combines features
and Internet tools of MSN, such as Hotmail, Messenger and search, with
the broadband content and services offered by Sympatico.ca.
Bell executive Pierre Blouin said the combined site will reach more
than 90 per cent of people on-line in Canada. Microsoft Canada president
Frank Clegg described Canadians as “world-leaders in broadband
adoption.”
The two companies first announced the joint venture last June. Bell
Canada, the country's largest phone company, is owned by Montreal-based
BCE Inc., which also controls Bell Globemedia, owner of The Globe and
Mail, globeandmail.com and the CTV television network. Redmond,
Wash.-based Microsoft is the world's biggest software maker.
News Source:
The Globe and mail
|
|
|
Microsoft Corp. has filed suit against nearly 200 people
accused of sending millions of fraudulent, unwanted e-mail
messages, including one Florida man considered to be among the
worst "spammers" in the world.
The Redmond, Wash., company, in an effort to slow the a
barrage of junk e-mail directed at its customers, filed four
lawsuits on Wednesday and four others on June 2, each naming at
least 20 defendants whose identities are not known.
"These are high-volume spammers that are responsible for
sending hundreds of millions of spam messages," said Tim Cranton,
a senior lawyer at Microsoft.
The company also named Florida resident John Hites, who as
recently as November was listed as one of the world's top 10
spammers by Spamhaus, a nonprofit antispam group in Britain.
Microsoft said Mr. Hites is connected to HB Systems and Ads
Inc., two foreign companies thought to have operations in the
United States. Pin Point Media, a company based in either Coral
Springs, Fla., or Weston, Fla., also was named. Mr. Hites and
representatives from the three companies could not be reached
for comment.
Microsoft said it hopes to identify unknown defendants
through the discovery process. It is seeking injunctions against
the defendants and could collect as much as $1 million in civil
fines from each one.
Microsoft is suing under the federal Can-Spam Act, which
went into effect on Jan. 1, as well as the Washington Commercial
Electronic Mail Act and the Washington Consumer Protection Act.
In the suits, Microsoft accuses the defendants of using false or
misleading subject lines on their e-mail messages and using
illegal computer tricks to remain anonymous.
The company, which processes e-mail for more than 170
million active accounts on its MSN Internet and Hotmail e-mail
services, has filed 51 suits against spammers in the United
States. Four of those resulted in settlements, two resulted in
the bankruptcy of the defendants, and five others resulted in
judgments for Microsoft.
"We're raising the stakes, we're making it more expensive
for spammers," Mr. Cranton said. "A lot of the established
spammers are realizing that it's much harder to operate."
But so far, lawsuits against spammers have not led to a
decline in the amount of spam sent to e-mail inboxes. Spam makes
up between 64 percent and 78 percent of all e-mail worldwide,
according to companies that filter billions of messages each
month.
Spam volume has gone up by more than 30 percent in the past
year, and as much as 10 percent since the Can-Spam Act went into
effect.
Spammers are not only ramping up the amount of spam they
send, but appear to have no intention of crafting their messages
to comply with the law. Two separate reports from antispam
companies this week revealed that less than 10 percent of spam
complies with the law.
"So far, these suits haven't had any effect, but I wouldn't
cast it off as window dressing either," said Frank Gorman,
counsel at the Bryan Cave law firm and former legal counsel for
the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection.
"It's not going to make an impact by itself, but you have to
approach it from every angle."
News Source:
Washington Times |
|
|
|
Administrative Template files are used to populate user
interface settings in the Group Policy Object Editor, enabling
administrators to manage registry-based policy settings. Each
successive Windows operating system and service pack includes a
newer version of these .adm files.
Previously, customers could only obtain the most recent .adm
files by obtaining the latest service pack or operating system.
Now, these .adm files are available directly from this page.
This page provides access to each version of the original .adm
files that shipped with each operating system or service pack.
Each set of .adm files is included in a Microsoft Installer (MSI)
package, available for download at source
Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003
News Source:
MS Download |
Posted 06/11/2004 @ 12:12 PM,
by
Eric Bangeman
There's nothing like a bit of competition to get
vendors to budge on their prices. Many companies
negotiating deals with Microsoft have
discovered this to be true, especially when they
bring up the possibility of a Linux deployment. While
not divulging any details about specific negotiations
and prices, Microsoft Director Marketing Nick Barley has
admitted that their customers are increasingly using the
tactic of dropping the L-word in their dealings with
Microsoft.
"It's definitely more of a
threat than it was," said Barley, when asked if more
businesses are telling Microsoft that they're
planning to migrate to Linux rather than to one of
its own operating systems or applications in the
hope of getting a better deal. "It shouldn't be
successful if we have built an appropriate
value-based relationships with our customers, so
that they appreciate the extra value that we offer."
The mere fact that their customers are considering
deploying Linux demonstrates that there is some
dissatisfaction with Microsoft's enterprise solutions,
whether centered around licensing, price, security, or
other issues. While Microsoft is touting some wins over
open-source alternatives in recent negotiations, some of
those came only after they came down in price. Microsoft
is definitely taking threats of Linux deployment
seriously, and is even
kicking off a "Get the Facts" road show in the UK to
evangelize their view that Linux really is more
expensive than Windows. Coupled with other
recent attempts by supposedly-independent groups to
attack Linux as a danger to the economy and as the
misbegotten progeny of stolen intellectual property from
Linux, it seems that regardless of what the actual
threat from Linux to their dominance may be, Microsoft
is leaving little to chance.
[
Discussion |
Send to a Friend |
Permanent Link ]
|
Posted
06/10/2004 @ 7:43 PM, by
Ken "Caesar" Fisher
Sander Olson met with Intel folks at
an Intel/PC Magazine-sponsored
"Technology for Business Today"
conference and picked up some rather
interesting, if not
confusing tidbits. First, Sander
says that Intel believes that the
Pentium M's pipeline is too short for
HyperThreading, and as a result, the
company still expects Prescott to be the
desktop CPU of choice through 2005.
Indeed, these Prescott CPUs will be dual
core.
This Intel employee was able to
clarify Intel's plans for both the
Prescott and the Pentium M
processors. Intel is planning on
developing a derivative of the
Pentium M for the desktop, but this
new processor will not replace
Prescott. The main reason for this,
according to Intel, is that the
Pentium M short-pipeline core is
poorly suited to Hyper-Threading.
Intel is confident that software
supporting Hyper-Threading will soon
become common, making the Pentium 4
an even better proposition for
consumers. Moreover, future versions
of Prescott, which could be out by
the end of 2005, will definitely be
dual-core. Since each core will have
Hyper-Threading enabled, the OS will
be tricked into believing that the
desktop computer contains four CPUs.
Now, your guess is as good as mine,
but it sounds like this "Intel
employee," whom the report identifies as
a marketing manager, was talking out the
rear, as we say in Beantown.
HyperThreading, for what it's worth,
might "take off" in the future but right
now what's taking off is the
competition. Now, Intel may have some
mojo up its sleeve that hasn't made its
way through my sources, but I'll be
rather surprised to see dual core
Prescotts running at today's speeds in a
year's time unless Intel has managed to
patent a dry ice freezer for cooling
purposes. The future is quite
clearly the Pentium M, unless Intel
has solved power leakage problems and
not told anyone about it (which is
possible,
but unlikely). My best guess with
the information at hand is that this is
Intel marketing speaking, and Intel
marketing isn't going to tell you that
Prescott doesn't have a future, or that
Intel might release a dual core Prescott
at a much lower clockspeed to manage the
heat.
Update: Intel has said that
the company has provided no such
specifics publicly. 60% of the time,
that means there's a little truth to the
story. Of course, which part is true
we're not sure.
[
Discussion |
Send to a Friend |
Permanent Link ] |
|
|
|
|
|